What is actually Every person obtaining superior accuracy with for 180gr drugs and 4831? Just in search of a starting point so I don't squander a bunch of factors. Many thanks for the assistance!
They've carried out identically for me. Like All people else I rushed to find the more recent SC Edition but have now switched back again. Ideally you need about one hundred% loading density. Should you have sufficient case capability with the H4831(long) you're possibly far better off.
The most obvious induce is actually a rough/ruff bore. No volume of copper fouling lessening agents while in the powder will almost certainly right this.
Warning utilizing SC or SSC formulated loads with extended Reduce, back again off and function up. Use Risk-free loading techniques.
Thornton, CO Supply of H4831SC is beginning to dwindle down far too so get what you may need on your new load I'd counsel. Can be all of almost nothing should they restock anything shortly but those powders are owning transport regulation problems.
I am aware, tough situations. H4831SC will certainly function, I just didn't like the case density when loaded extended. I don't don't forget powder cost off the highest of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that is in which I typically goal to get. With your scenario utilizing what you have (and what I ought to have carried out) I would get started with the tip from the bearing area with the bullet appropriate on the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you look for a velocity node.
You might have for making several more posts to have cleared to complete PM's. When you finally get to that standing I might submit during the categorized reloading segment to discover if anybody is in your area to get a trade.
The SC or SSC specified powders Usually permit for higher load density, to help you generally get somewhat much more powder inside of a offered circumstance when employing compressed loads. Use of a fall tube can more increase this edge.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to reap the benefits of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Severe powder.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they've got slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are much better. It bug the hell outside of me. I am aware far better. That's why I do not ever toss out my older manuals. I do order new guide all the time to stay h4831 vs h4831sc up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ degrees with no issues.
I have experienced related experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders would not shoot perfectly with anything except Fed215's. Some factors just don't play well with other. Seems like you've got preferred three very good powders, I'd count on at the very least one of them to shoot.
Like Every person claimed, the SC stands for “quick Slice” and h4831 vs h4831sc is a little bit simpler to meter. Will make you query why they would even now make the frequent 1.
I am aware the H4831SC gives an improved load density But I do think I have ample home in my situation for the conventional H4831.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are unique. Exactly where there's a chance you're h4831 vs h4831sc perplexing it and believing that it is near is H4831 and H4831SC are really equivalent. Those people two are virtually the exact same except H4831SC is manufactured to lesser grains so it meters less difficult.